<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the difference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2008/05/whats-the-difference.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2008/05/whats-the-difference.html</link>
	<description>A Conservative-supporting thinking blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:40:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Paine</title>
		<link>http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2008/05/whats-the-difference.html/comment-page-1#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 07:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/?p=1489#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>Dylan Thomas defined an alcoholic as &quot;Someone you don&#039;t like who drinks as much as you do.&quot; To a religious person, a follower of a cult is someone he doesn&#039;t like who believes in stuff as weird as he does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dylan Thomas defined an alcoholic as &#8220;Someone you don&#8217;t like who drinks as much as you do.&#8221; To a religious person, a follower of a cult is someone he doesn&#8217;t like who believes in stuff as weird as he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nickopotamus</title>
		<link>http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2008/05/whats-the-difference.html/comment-page-1#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator>Nickopotamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/?p=1489#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Our advice is that it is not abusive or insulting and there is no offensiveness (as opposed to criticism), neither in the idea expressed nor in the mode of expression.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The CPS have also &quot;advised&quot; CoL police on how to handle similar cases in the future. The key point is that &quot;insulting&quot; has to be from J Random Pulblic&#039;s point of view, not from a Scientologist&#039;s.

What&#039;s more worrying is the extent to which it appears &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6171948.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CoS have affected the police force&lt;/a&gt;, not just in this country but worldwide (the Ontario Ministry of Justice declared them a criminal organisation after attempting a similar stunt for example). But was this particular incident due to that? Or was it just a police officer who didn&#039;t understand the law completely getting a bit carried away, maybe under the direction of a Scientologist who took offence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our advice is that it is not abusive or insulting and there is no offensiveness (as opposed to criticism), neither in the idea expressed nor in the mode of expression.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The CPS have also &#8220;advised&#8221; CoL police on how to handle similar cases in the future. The key point is that &#8220;insulting&#8221; has to be from J Random Pulblic&#8217;s point of view, not from a Scientologist&#8217;s.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more worrying is the extent to which it appears <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6171948.stm" rel="nofollow">CoS have affected the police force</a>, not just in this country but worldwide (the Ontario Ministry of Justice declared them a criminal organisation after attempting a similar stunt for example). But was this particular incident due to that? Or was it just a police officer who didn&#8217;t understand the law completely getting a bit carried away, maybe under the direction of a Scientologist who took offence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2008/05/whats-the-difference.html/comment-page-1#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/?p=1489#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting discussion. As you say, classic definitions of the word show little difference in meaning and one has to move to more idiomatic &amp; contemporary definitions. Indeed were it not so he would have been accused on the basis of saying &quot;$cientology is a religion&quot; - weird indeed.

But prevalent use is the modern usage: Fowler&#039;s Modern English simply says &quot;a popular fashion followed by a specific section of society&quot;.

As it turns out the CPS have dropped it but the point will be taken - one hopes - by the City and other police farces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting discussion. As you say, classic definitions of the word show little difference in meaning and one has to move to more idiomatic &amp; contemporary definitions. Indeed were it not so he would have been accused on the basis of saying &#8220;$cientology is a religion&#8221; &#8211; weird indeed.</p>
<p>But prevalent use is the modern usage: Fowler&#8217;s Modern English simply says &#8220;a popular fashion followed by a specific section of society&#8221;.</p>
<p>As it turns out the CPS have dropped it but the point will be taken &#8211; one hopes &#8211; by the City and other police farces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
