<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thornhill bans parents from Watford playgrounds: the Lib Dem reaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2009/10/thornhill-bans-parents-from-watford-playgrounds-the-lib-dem-reaction.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2009/10/thornhill-bans-parents-from-watford-playgrounds-the-lib-dem-reaction.html</link>
	<description>A Conservative-supporting thinking blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:58:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mo Koyejo</title>
		<link>http://www.blueidea.co.uk/2009/10/thornhill-bans-parents-from-watford-playgrounds-the-lib-dem-reaction.html/comment-page-1#comment-2733</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo Koyejo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2009/10/thornhill-bans-parents-from-watford-playgrounds-the-lib-dem-reaction.html#comment-2733</guid>
		<description>1.	I am one of the parents that was staying at the facility, because my child, is under five, four and half to be exact…..
The prerequisite always was that a parent/carer should always be around, if your child was under five, so to suggest, that parents just started hanging around for no reason is not true……
I will provide a link to the ofsted report conducted in 2007 that sums up, what this adventure playground is all about, everything else is just spin, to get oneself out of hot water
http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxcare_reports/display/(id)/30504

If the staff had any problems with the parents, they could have banned the individuals,  if there warning was not heeded.....
Was all this really necessary????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.	I am one of the parents that was staying at the facility, because my child, is under five, four and half to be exact…..<br />
The prerequisite always was that a parent/carer should always be around, if your child was under five, so to suggest, that parents just started hanging around for no reason is not true……<br />
I will provide a link to the ofsted report conducted in 2007 that sums up, what this adventure playground is all about, everything else is just spin, to get oneself out of hot water<br />
<a href="http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxcare_reports/display/(id)/30504" rel="nofollow">http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxcare_reports/display/(id)/30504</a></p>
<p>If the staff had any problems with the parents, they could have banned the individuals,  if there warning was not heeded&#8230;..<br />
Was all this really necessary????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
