Accuracy or speed at general election counts? Both, thanks.

by Chris | 3 Jan 2010 | 2 Comments

election-countWe may not know the result of the general election for up to 24 hours after the polls have closed because at least 64 seats will not be counting votes until the Friday – and another 161 are considering following suit. Included in this shameful group is my own constituency, Watford.

The Electoral Commission is trying to justify this on that basis that

The worst-case scenario is the result being called into question because the count is inaccurate.

That has never, ever, been a problem before. And I can’t see how it would be if returning officers have half a brain and set up their processes properly. Plus, of course, parties have agents, activists and their candidates at counts in order to check that things are going right. And if the result is so close that a small amount of miscounting could change it, a recount can be called for.

Thursday night election results are an election tradition. It should not be disregarded.

We should be able to count votes both accurately and fast. We always have been able to do so in the past. So why is 2010 suddenly so different? Returning officers should be able to manage this, or they shouldn’t be doing the job.

I want to see the result of my vote being cast as soon as possible. Delay for the sake of delay is not acceptable. It should be a requirement that general election counts are held that evening.

Democracy demands it.

2 Comments »

  • QM said:

    The one reason that springs to mind about any delay is fraud. Ballot boxes go missing, get tampered with all in the delay before counting. This along with postal block voting could see a very different election result to the ones predicted in the polls.

  • opsimath said:

    Quite right, QM. As a Mr Stalin once observed, it doesn’t matter who votes or how they vote; the only important thing is who counts the votes.

    Not that I’m saying our glorious leader (mark 2) would ever do anything so underhand!

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.